Study identifier:D589GC00002
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:N/A
EudraCT identifier:N/A
CTIS identifier:N/A
A Phase 2, randomized, blinded, 5-period cross-over, placebo and active-controlled, multicenter, dose-finding study of single doses of formoterol 2.25 µg, 4.5 µg, and 9 µg delivered via Symbicort® pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) and Foradil® Aerolizer® 12 µg evaluating the bronchodilating effects and safety in children, ages 6 to <12 years, with asthma who are receiving background treatment with budesonide pMDI 160 ug bid
asthma
Phase 2
No
80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI, 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI, Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg, 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI, placebo HFA pMDI, 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI
All
54
Interventional
6 Years - 11 Years
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Double Blind
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Verified 01 Mar 2014 by AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca
-
This purpose of the study is to investigate the bronchodilating effects of 3 different dosages of formoterol given in combination with budesonide as Symbicort pMDI.
A Phase 2, randomized, blinded, 5-period cross-over, placebo and active controlled, multicenter, dose-finding study comparing single doses of formoterol 2.25 µg, 4.5 µg, and 9 µg delivered via Symbicort pMDI and Foradil® 12 µg evaluating the relative bronchodilating effects and safety in children.
Location
Location
KRUGERSDORP, Gauteng, South Africa
Location
ALTOONA, PA, United States
Location
BUDAPEST, Hungary
Location
CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA, South Africa
Location
CAPE TOWN, W CAPE, South Africa
Location
CHARLESTON, SC, United States
Location
CLAREMONT, W CAPE, South Africa
Location
DUBLIN, Bulgaria
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
Experimental: BUD 160/FM 2.25 2.25 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI × 1 inhalation) + 40 μg budesonide (BUD)hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pMDI × 2 inhalations | Drug: 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI inhalation Drug: 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI inhalation |
Experimental: BUD 160/FM 4.5 placebo HFA pMDI × 1 inhalation + 4.5 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI × 2 inhalations) | Drug: 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI inhalation Drug: placebo HFA pMDI inhalation |
Experimental: BUD 160/FM 9.0 placebo HFA pMDI × 1 inhalation + 9 μg formoterol (as 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI × 2 inhalations) | Drug: 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI inhalation Drug: placebo HFA pMDI inhalation |
Placebo Comparator: BUD 160 placebo HFA pMDI × 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations | Drug: 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI inhalation Drug: placebo HFA pMDI inhalation Drug: 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI inhalation |
Active Comparator: BUD 160/Foradil 12.0 Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg × 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations | Drug: Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg inhalation Drug: 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI inhalation Drug: 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI inhalation |
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
---|
This multicenter study was conducted in Europe and the United States between 7 October 2010 and 3 January 2012. |
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
---|
The study consisted of a screening visit, an enrolment visit, a 1- to 2-week run-in (standardization) period, randomization at Visit 3, and 4 further visits (Visits 4-7)separated by approximately 7-day (minimum 3 days; maximum 14 days) wash-out (stabilization) periods. Subjects received 1 of 5 single-dose treatments at Visits 3-7, in random order. |
Description | |
---|---|
Randomized patients | All randomized patients |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 54 |
COMPLETED | 54 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 54 |
COMPLETED | 53 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 |
Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 53 |
COMPLETED | 53 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 53 |
COMPLETED | 52 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 |
Adverse Event | 1 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 53 |
COMPLETED | 53 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 53 |
COMPLETED | 51 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 |
Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Adverse Event | 1 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 51 |
COMPLETED | 51 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 51 |
COMPLETED | 51 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 50 |
COMPLETED | 50 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
STARTED | 50 |
COMPLETED | 50 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Description | |
---|---|
Randomized patients | All randomized patients |
Randomized patients | |
---|---|
Number of Participants
[units: Participants] |
54 |
Age Continuous [units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
9.2 ± 1.79 |
Age, Customized [units: participants] |
|
>=6 to <8 years | 11 |
>=8 to < 12 years | 43 |
Gender, Male/Female [units: participants] |
|
Female | 23 |
Male | 31 |
Race (NIH/OMB) [units: participants] |
|
American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
Asian | 0 |
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
Black or African American | 22 |
White | 31 |
More than one race | 0 |
Unknown or Not Reported | 1 |
Measure Type | Primary |
---|---|
Measure Name | Average 12 hour forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) |
Measure Description | Pulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. FEV1 was obtained from the full expiratory flow-volume-time curve. FEV1 was measured at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes post administration of randomized study medication. Twelve-hour serial FEV1 was calculated through an AUC determination and then divided by time, so that the final value is expressed in liters. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0. |
Time Frame | at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes postdose |
Safety Issue? | No |
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
---|
Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint. |
Description | |
---|---|
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | 2.25 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 1 inhalation) + 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 4.5 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 4.5 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160/FM 9.0 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 9 μg formoterol (as 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI x 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | BUD 160/FM 4.5 | BUD 160/FM 9.0 | BUD 160 | BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of
Participants Analyzed [units:participants] |
54 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
Average 12 hour forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) [units: liters] Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) |
1.546 (0.0097) | 1.594 (0.0099) | 1.603 (0.0099) | 1.489 (0.0101) | 1.603 (0.0101) |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 9.0, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.114 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0140 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.087 to 0.142 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.105 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0140 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.078 to 0.133 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.058 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0141 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.030 to 0.085 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.5223 |
Other [5] | -0.009 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0139 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.036 to 0.018 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0001 |
Other [5] | -0.057 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0139 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.084 to -0.029 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 4.5 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0007 |
Other [5] | -0.048 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0138 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.075 to -0.020 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | -0.114 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0141 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.142 to -0.086 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0001 |
Other [5] | -0.056 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0141 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.084 to -0.028 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.5394 |
Other [5] | -0.009 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0141 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.036 to 0.019 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 9.0, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.9863 |
Other [5] | 0.000 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0140 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.027 to 0.028 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Measure Type | Secondary |
---|---|
Measure Name | FEV1 at 12 hours after study medication inhalation |
Measure Description | Pulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. The FEV1 value at 12 hours after dosing was taken as the 12-hour measurement (720 minutes) from the serial spirometry. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0. |
Time Frame | 12 hours after dosing |
Safety Issue? | No |
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
---|
Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint. |
Description | |
---|---|
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | 2.25 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 1 inhalation) + 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 4.5 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 4.5 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160/FM 9.0 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 9 μg formoterol (as 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI x 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | BUD 160/FM 4.5 | BUD 160/FM 9.0 | BUD 160 | BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of
Participants Analyzed [units:participants] |
54 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
FEV1 at 12 hours after study medication inhalation [units: liters] Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) |
1.641 (0.0175) | 1.692 (0.0177) | 1.731 (0.0177) | 1.626 (0.0181) | 1.709 (0.0182) |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 9.0, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.105 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0250 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.056 to 0.155 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0092 |
Other [5] | 0.066 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0252 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.017 to 0.116 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.5509 |
Other [5] | 0.015 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0252 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.035 to 0.065 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.1163 |
Other [5] | -0.039 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0249 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.088 to 0.010 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0004 |
Other [5] | -0.090 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0250 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.140 to -0.041 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 4.5 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0400 |
Other [5] | -0.051 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0247 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.100 to -0.002 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0011 |
Other [5] | -0.083 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0252 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.133 to -0.034 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0077 |
Other [5] | -0.068 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0254 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.118 to -0.018 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.4957 |
Other [5] | -0.017 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0252 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.067 to 0.033 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 9.0, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.3800 |
Other [5] | 0.022 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0250 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.027 to 0.071 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
LOCF was performed if missing data were post last non-missing post-baseline assessment. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Measure Type | Secondary |
---|---|
Measure Name | Maximal FEV1 during the 12-hour study period |
Measure Description | Pulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. FEV1 was measured at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes post administration of randomized study medication. The maximum FEV1 value was defined as the largest observed FEV1 value recorded during each 12-hour serial spirometry procedure. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0. |
Time Frame | at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes postdose |
Safety Issue? | No |
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
---|
Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint. |
Description | |
---|---|
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | 2.25 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 1 inhalation) + 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 4.5 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 4.5 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160/FM 9.0 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 9 μg formoterol (as 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI x 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | BUD 160/FM 4.5 | BUD 160/FM 9.0 | BUD 160 | BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of
Participants Analyzed [units:participants] |
54 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 51 |
Maximal FEV1 during the 12-hour study period [units: liters] Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) |
1.833 (0.0119) | 1.889 (0.0120) | 1.884 (0.0120) | 1.777 (0.0123) | 1.892 (0.0123) |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 9.0, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.107 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0170 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.073 to 0.140 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.112 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0171 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.078 to 0.146 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0011 |
Other [5] | 0.057 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0172 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.023 to 0.090 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.7589 |
Other [5] | 0.005 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0169 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.028 to 0.039 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0035 |
Other [5] | -0.050 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0170 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.084 to -0.017 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 4.5 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0011 |
Other [5] | -0.055 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0168 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.089 to -0.022 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | -0.115 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0171 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.149 to -0.081 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0008 |
Other [5] | -0.058 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0172 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.092 to -0.024 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.8582 |
Other [5] | -0.003 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0172 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.037 to 0.031 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 9.0, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANCOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.6276 |
Other [5] | -0.008 |
Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.0170 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.042 to 0.025 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
No text entered. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Measure Type | Secondary |
---|---|
Measure Name | Urinary excretion of formoterol during the 12 hours following inhalation of study drug |
Measure Description | The amount of formoterol excreted unchanged in urine over the 12-hour period after administration [Ae(0-12h)] was calculated from the concentration of formoterol in urine multiplied by the total volume of urine collected. Volume was determined from the weight of the collected urine times an assumed urine density of 1020 g/L. The data for six patients who did not have measurable formoterol in their urine on the Foradil 12 μg treatment day was excluded from the analysis. All other urine concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were set to zero. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0. |
Time Frame | 0 to 12 hours |
Safety Issue? | No |
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
---|
Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint. |
Description | |
---|---|
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | 2.25 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 1 inhalation) + 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 4.5 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 4.5 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160/FM 9.0 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 9 μg formoterol (as 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | BUD 160/FM 4.5 | BUD 160/FM 9.0 | BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of
Participants Analyzed [units:participants] |
51 | 52 | 51 | 43 |
Urinary excretion of formoterol during the 12 hours following inhalation of study drug [units: pmol] Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) |
192.0 (156.36 to 235.88) | 366.3 (298.85 to 448.96) | 740.6 (602.45 to 910.51) | 658.7 (522.61 to 830.24) |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 4.5 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.52 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.393 to 0.700 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
A shift log transformation was performed on the response variable in the ANOVA model, using log(response) [log(response + 1) if response is 0]. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.26 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.194 to 0.347 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
A shift log transformation was performed on the response variable in the ANOVA model, using log(response) [log(response + 1) if response is 0]. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 2.25, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.29 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.214 to 0.396 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
A shift log transformation was performed on the response variable in the ANOVA model, using log(response) [log(response + 1) if response is 0]. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/FM 9.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANOVA |
P-Value [4] | <0.0001 |
Other [5] | 0.49 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.371 to 0.659 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
A shift log transformation was performed on the response variable in the ANOVA model, using log(response) [log(response + 1) if response is 0]. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 4.5, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.0002 |
Other [5] | 0.56 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.409 to 0.755 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
A shift log transformation was performed on the response variable in the ANOVA model, using log(response) [log(response + 1) if response is 0]. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Groups [1] | BUD 160/FM 9.0, BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 |
---|---|
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | No |
Method [3] | ANOVA |
P-Value [4] | 0.4512 |
Other [5] | 1.12 |
95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.827 to 1.528 ) |
[1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
---|---|
Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment. | |
[2] | Additional details about a non-inferiority or equivalence analysis: |
No text entered. | |
[3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
A shift log transformation was performed on the response variable in the ANOVA model, using log(response) [log(response + 1) if response is 0]. | |
[4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
No text entered. | |
[5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
No text entered. |
Time Frame | No text entered. |
---|---|
Additional Description | One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0. |
Description | |
---|---|
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | 2.25 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 1 inhalation) + 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 4.5 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 4.5 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160/FM 9.0 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 9 μg formoterol (as 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI x 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | BUD 160/FM 4.5 | BUD 160/FM 9.0 | BUD 160 | BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total, serious adverse events | |||||
# participants affected / at risk | 0/54 (0.00%) | 0/53 (0.00%) | 0/53 (0.00%) | 0/51 (0.00%) | 0/50 (0.00%) |
Time Frame | No text entered. |
---|---|
Additional Description | One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0. |
Threshold above which other adverse events are reported | 5% |
---|
Description | |
---|---|
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | 2.25 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 1 inhalation) + 40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 4.5 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 4.5 μg formoterol (as 80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160/FM 9.0 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 9 μg formoterol (as 80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI x 2 inhalations) |
BUD 160 | placebo HFA pMDI x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI x 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | Foradil Aerolizer 12 μg x 1 inhalation + 80 μg budesonide HFA pMDI × 2 inhalations |
BUD 160/FM 2.25 | BUD 160/FM 4.5 | BUD 160/FM 9.0 | BUD 160 | BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total, other (not including serious) adverse events | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# participants affected / at risk | 1/54 (1.85%) | 1/53 (1.89%) | 5/53 (9.43%) | 2/51 (3.92%) | 0/50 (0.00%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nervous system disorders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Headache1, † | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# participants affected / at risk | 1/54 (1.85%) | 1/53 (1.89%) | 5/53 (9.43%) | 2/51 (3.92%) | 0/50 (0.00%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
---|
No text entered. |
Name/Title: | Göran Eckerwall, MSD |
Organization: | AstraZeneca |
E-mail: | [email protected] |
This information is not intended to replace the informed medical advice or medical treatments of a healthcare professional. Only a physician can determine if a specific medicine is the correct treatment for a particular patient. If you have questions regarding any information contained in this site, you must consult a suitably qualified healthcare professional. Before prescribing any AstraZeneca products, Healthcare Professionals should view their country specific information.